The brain absorption companies:Consulting Firms make the world worse Background I saw the news that many highly educated persons in Japan try to join in consulting firms. Their purposes may be short term profits and early retirements. I knew their purposes because I had same purpose… Consulting Firms make the world better or worse? Consulting Firms doesn’t make new products nor new fields, they only try to win competitions. They make the world worse. Brain absorption companies Consulting Firms are the brain absorption companies which absorb the thinking of business managers. Consulting Firms try to take charge of CEOs’ thinking. So that Consulting Firms absorb client companies’ brains. Consulting Firms’ arm They admire business professors’ theory. They use it as arm to client companies. However, theory doesn’t allow just one counterexample. Business professors’ theory is not to be called theory, it is to be called as hypothesis or idea (or joke). So that consulti
2016/9/27 High Efficiency without effect: Poor strategy with great tactics
Strategy: Aiming to effect
Tactics: Improving efficiency
High efficiency without effect is this: Poor strategy with great tactics.
There are 4 patterns about strategy and tactics in economy.
1. Great strategy with great tactics. Excellent company.
2. Great strategy with poor tactics. Excellent company in bad terms.
3. Poor strategy with great tactics. Commodity company in good terms.
4. Poor strategy with poor tactics. Commodity company.
I think that the difference between excellent company and commodity company is the attitude to the effects or money.
Excellent company aims to get effects and gets money as the result.
Commodity company chases money.
It is hard to identify excellent company in bad terms and commodity company in good terms from outside.
If I meet to the commodity company in good terms, in fact the high efficiency without effect, I can learn the great tactics from that company.
Because that company has some great tactics.
Strategy: Aiming to effect
Tactics: Improving efficiency
High efficiency without effect is this: Poor strategy with great tactics.
There are 4 patterns about strategy and tactics in economy.
1. Great strategy with great tactics. Excellent company.
2. Great strategy with poor tactics. Excellent company in bad terms.
3. Poor strategy with great tactics. Commodity company in good terms.
4. Poor strategy with poor tactics. Commodity company.
I think that the difference between excellent company and commodity company is the attitude to the effects or money.
Excellent company aims to get effects and gets money as the result.
Commodity company chases money.
It is hard to identify excellent company in bad terms and commodity company in good terms from outside.
If I meet to the commodity company in good terms, in fact the high efficiency without effect, I can learn the great tactics from that company.
Because that company has some great tactics.
Comments
Post a Comment