Creating favorite opinions

  Active vs Passive Recently, I thought about “Active vs Passive”. Active behavior is difficult for passive person. Passive behavior is difficult for active person. Passive behavior is good at in closed market. Active behavior is good at in opening market. Passive person is good at optimization. Active person is good at change. In the ending of past-capitalism, if we want to survive, we should to be active person. Mixed with BE-DO-HAVE principle, we should to be active, do active actions, and have active results. I don’t know how to win surely and safety, but I know passive person always lose in this era.

  Platforms Owners, Platforms Insiders, Upper Outsiders, Middle Outsiders, Lower Outsiders, and Consumers There are several positions for Platforms, such as YouTube, X(Twitter), and other SNSs. (Center)Platforms Owners (Near center)Platforms insiders (Outer of Center)Outsiders and Consumers From Outsiders’s view, there may be triangle hierarchy. But I sometimes think that there are one core circle and some outer rings. If we use information technologies, we can’t escape from Platforms.

  Wisdom indicators I felt that information technologies changed the world. They also changed wisdom indicators. I thought wisdom indicators were IQ, Patents and academic papers in the past. Now, I think the wisdom indicators are numbers of published Apps, SNS views and followers. If we don’t know the changes of widom indicators, we will be left to the past.

  Human evaluations are difficult, because they are all opinions. Human evaluations are very difficult. Because they are all someone’s opinions. I found it. Human vertical and horizontal evaluations are all stood on someone’s opinions. So that there is no perfect evaluation. If some consultants bring to you perfect human resource evaluation, the consultants are liars.

  Pretender to be tough easily shifts to be weak I know one pretender to be tough. The person shifted to be weak after he/she lost own bluff. I thought about the difference between real confidence and bluff. Real confidence stands by our sides, but bluff is put on own faces. Real confidence makes us stronger. Bluff can make us both of stronger and weaker. In other words, real confidence is asset, but bluff is risk. The result of bluff will be better or worse than without bluff. (I don’t like such risk, so that I try not to use bluff.) I thought about below matrix. Result With Real confidence Without Real confidence With Bluff Middle Risk and High Return  High Risk and Middle Return Without Bluff Low Risk and Middle Return Middle Risk and Low Return I don’t know this matrix is true, but not so far from true. Then I thought about another things, “Are there perfect method?” If I have real confidence and don’t use bluff, there ar...

  Investment too many money, is it good or bad for investor and investment target? Background If some investors invest 1 trillion dollars to investment target, they will expect some returns. Is this good or bad? The answer will depend on the investors and the target. When the returns is 5% yield, the target pays 50 billon dollars for 1 trillion dollars debt. Lender’s logic and Borrower’s logic Lender will think that borrower has to pay the return because lender took risk. Borrower will think that lender is bad because lender lend money than borrower can pay back. (Of course, this is not my story. I don’t have a debt.) Japan gov and US gov Japan gov lend money to US gov as to buy government bond. Does Japan gov take risk? I think it’s NO. They borrow money from Japanese people and they lend money to US gov. If lender don’t take risk, who does take the risk? Japanese people… Over lending Further, I think over lending have to be ruled. Over lending may cause ove...

  WMWB:We Make World Better I changed my mind. From “World Never Make America Great Again”(WNMAGA) to “We Make World Better”(WMWB). Further, not it is “your” problem nor “his/her” problem nor “their” problem, but “OUR” problem. America’s problem is not Americans’ problem, but our problem. (Also Japan’s problem is not Japanese’ problem, but our problem, too.) Not only my choice, but our choice.

  One Fraud in the Japanese Pachinko Industry In Japan, the pachinko industry has been facing numerous challenges, and among them, I have noticed a particular fraudulent practice in some pachinko shops. This article aims to shed light on this issue and foster a conversation about its implications. The Fraudulent Practice Some pachinko shops employ individuals known as "UCHIKO" (打ち子). These are people hired to play pachinko machines under specific conditions to manipulate profits. According to the linked Wikipedia article, UCHIKO are commonly used in gambling-related frauds in Japan. I observed that certain machines are marked to indicate they are suitable for UCHIKO to play. One common sign is that the bottom plate of the pachinko machine is left open. These machines are often set to have loose settings, meaning that UCHIKO can easily win when they play. However, the machine appears to "tighten" when regular customers use it, resulting in significant losses for...

  Own view to World and I I thought about feeling method about world and I. The principle questions are “What is the World?”, “Who am I?”. There are several feelings about these questions’ answers. View to World and I I am [ positive ] I am [ normal ] I am [ negative ] World is [ positive ] Normal A Mismatch B1 Mismatch C World is [ normal ] Positive thinking Normal B Negative thinking World is [ negative ] Mismatch A Mismatch B2 Normal C I categorized the answers in above matrix. If “World is [negative]” and “I am [normal]” is the answer, Mismatch B2 is my position. Then if we want to change something, we should change view to the world or I.