Skip to main content

USA:From being Leader to Dealer

USA:From being Leader to Dealer American people have stopped to have leadership. I felt something sad, but it’s okay. USA country turned from leader to dealer. Some American wanted to make America great again.(MAGA) The world NEVER makes America great again.(NMAGA)

Co-living with minority’s rich & majorities

2017/11/30. Co-living with minoritys rich &  majorities, is it possible?

I am watching twitter about USA new tax plan. Some people seems to think the tax cut is for minoritys rich.
In traditional economy, the government has role for keeping public safety.
But in now, the government became for minoritys rich.

I wonder that one government in USA is possible or not. It may be good for separating to the small government for riches & big government for majorities, and making common government for foreign affairs & army.
Maybe it is unnatural for 2 kinds of people, rich & majorities, co-living in same laws.

2 kinds, Rich earns money from foreign countries & majorities earn money from domestic companies. They are not same.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to find Cheat GPT in Business

  How to find Cheat GPT in Business Background ChatGPT is very good tool for Business writing. But ChatGPT is forbidden now when the Business treats secret information. I know it is right. Cheat GPT Cheat GPT is to use ChatGPT in the Business. How to find Cheat GPT? I found my leader’s Cheat GPT accidentally. The leader used ChatGPT in his home, so that there was no way to know Cheat GPT. I found it by miss font. The miss font was classic Chinese character(旧漢字). In Japan, no one use classic Chinese character from 1949. I use systematic grammar proofing application and it showed me there was classic Chinese Character. Abstracted way If there are many language characters, such as Chinese or Japanese, systematic font proofing application may be effective way to find Cheat GPT. ChatGPT and Hallucination is one set, and it is the way.

Own view to World and I

  Own view to World and I I thought about feeling method about world and I. The principle questions are “What is the World?”, “Who am I?”. There are several feelings about these questions’ answers. View to World and I I am [ positive ] I am [ normal ] I am [ negative ] World is [ positive ] Normal A Mismatch B1 Mismatch C World is [ normal ] Positive thinking Normal B Negative thinking World is [ negative ] Mismatch A Mismatch B2 Normal C I categorized the answers in above matrix. If “World is [negative]” and “I am [normal]” is the answer, Mismatch B2 is my position. Then if we want to change something, we should change view to the world or I.