Skip to main content

The brain absorption companies:Consulting Firms make the world worse

  The brain absorption companies:Consulting Firms make the world worse Background I saw the news that many highly educated persons in Japan try to join in consulting firms. Their purposes may be short term profits and early retirements. I knew their purposes because I had same purpose… Consulting Firms make the world better or worse? Consulting Firms doesn’t make new products nor new fields, they only try to win competitions. They make the world worse. Brain absorption companies Consulting Firms are the brain absorption companies which absorb the thinking of business managers. Consulting Firms try to take charge of CEOs’ thinking. So that Consulting Firms absorb client companies’ brains. Consulting Firms’ arm They admire business professors’ theory. They use it as arm to client companies. However, theory doesn’t allow just one counterexample. Business professors’ theory is not to be called theory, it is to be called as hypothesis or idea (or joke). So that consulti

TPP can stop the WW3

 TPP can stop the WW3




Background

TPP(Trans-Pacific Partnership)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Pacific_Partnership

TPP is the trade agreement around Pacific Rim.


Background2

USA and China have the conflict between them.

This conflict has possibility about WW3.


Can USA vs China turn to be USA & China?

I hope Yes.

It will be solved by USA and China to join TPP at the same time.

TPP has rules about the trade agreements.

If USA rejoins the TPP, China will be denied to join the TPP.

If China joins the TPP, USA will be denied to join the TPP.

So that if USA and China join TPP at the same time, this problem will be solved.

Then if USA want to leave TPP, USA can’t rejoin the TPP because of the presence of China.

The reverse is also true.

TPP can bring USA and China bigger trades.


More abstracted

TPP is one example.

There are some rules about the group just like TPP.

Both = USA and China

(1)There are benefits for both countries by joining the group.

(2)There are loss for both countries by leaving the group.

(3)Once one of both leave the group, it is impossible to return because of the presence of another one.

(4)Once one of both leave the group, another one gets remaining benefits and be winner.


My opinion

TPP is suitable for to solve USA vs China.

But there may be other groups just like TPP.


Addition

I have deleted this post.

But I repost again.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cheaper work

2016/12/29. Cheaper works: Hard competition makes expensive work cheaper. In Japan, there are some people who thinks there are a lot of workers, and they are exchangeable easily. This thought can't stand on human populations decreasing society. And in this society, the flow that provides products cheaper and cheaper cannot keep. Now, Japanese society is standing on that thought, and Japanese system hardly stands. This is by the patience of Japanese. When the breaking point of Japanese system comes, the counter of patience will keeps long time. And I think that communism never comes in Japan. Because Karl Marx doesn't think about human populations decreasing...

None feedback

2016/12/29. None feedback from others in Japanese company Feedback is not always visible or sound , especially the fact of feedback is hidden by various suits. And in Japanese company, I often see the scene that ignorance to the people who did careless mistakes. Others don't say anything about the careless mistakes in front of the person, but in background, others speak ill of the person. This is none feedback. None feedback from others is very bad feedback, but in Japanese company, it is often. Why none feedback happens? In my experience, there are some reasons. When the person who made mistakes is upper than others, others want the person to fall out. When the person is equal level to others, others want the person not to promote. When the person is lower level, others want to make the person the targets for inner circle. I rethink that none feedback in company is bad signal for organization... None feedback happens when the company is bad statements!!!