Skip to main content

Pretender to be tough easily shifts to be weak

  Pretender to be tough easily shifts to be weak I know one pretender to be tough. The person shifted to be weak after he/she lost own bluff. I thought about the difference between real confidence and bluff. Real confidence stands by our sides, but bluff is put on own faces. Real confidence makes us stronger. Bluff can make us both of stronger and weaker. In other words, real confidence is asset, but bluff is risk. The result of bluff will be better or worse than without bluff. (I don’t like such risk, so that I try not to use bluff.) I thought about below matrix. Result With Real confidence Without Real confidence With Bluff Middle Risk and High Return  High Risk and Middle Return Without Bluff Low Risk and Middle Return Middle Risk and Low Return I don’t know this matrix is true, but not so far from true. Then I thought about another things, “Are there perfect method?” If I have real confidence and don’t use bluff, there ar...
Post a Comment

Twitter: This is block app for learning

2018/1/24.  Twitter: This is block app for learning

I quit Twitter app for a while, because it doesn’t help learning Swift programming language…

Swift programming…
This is more difficult than I thought.
What by?
It’s no excuse that I haven’t learn programming.
But I don’t know how to talk with machine (i.e. Programming). And I research about error message to understand machine principles & reasons.
It takes too much time to solve errors…

The distance what I want to do on PC and what I can create on PC, is very far… But I want to learn Swift, and make the distance being near is standing on my efforts.

Learning machine language is just like teaching to the infants… Very difficult infants… They have a lot of passibility, but if I take a mistake, for example from “,” to ”.”, they never moves…
They don’t forgive my small mistakes… Maybe they think my small mistakes as very big…

I rethink that the difficulties to learn machine languages is from what I don’t think by words. When I solve small difficult problems, I don’t replace my thought to the words. Because thinking by words takes too much time.


Maybe people thinks by 2 or more methods, words & others. Thinking by words is important method, and learning programming will help my thinking ways more faster & correct. Thinking by words correctly, this is what I avoid in my life…

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Own view to World and I

  Own view to World and I I thought about feeling method about world and I. The principle questions are “What is the World?”, “Who am I?”. There are several feelings about these questions’ answers. View to World and I I am [ positive ] I am [ normal ] I am [ negative ] World is [ positive ] Normal A Mismatch B1 Mismatch C World is [ normal ] Positive thinking Normal B Negative thinking World is [ negative ] Mismatch A Mismatch B2 Normal C I categorized the answers in above matrix. If “World is [negative]” and “I am [normal]” is the answer, Mismatch B2 is my position. Then if we want to change something, we should change view to the world or I.
Post a Comment
Read more

How to find Cheat GPT in Business

  How to find Cheat GPT in Business Background ChatGPT is very good tool for Business writing. But ChatGPT is forbidden now when the Business treats secret information. I know it is right. Cheat GPT Cheat GPT is to use ChatGPT in the Business. How to find Cheat GPT? I found my leader’s Cheat GPT accidentally. The leader used ChatGPT in his home, so that there was no way to know Cheat GPT. I found it by miss font. The miss font was classic Chinese character(旧漢字). In Japan, no one use classic Chinese character from 1949. I use systematic grammar proofing application and it showed me there was classic Chinese Character. Abstracted way If there are many language characters, such as Chinese or Japanese, systematic font proofing application may be effective way to find Cheat GPT. ChatGPT and Hallucination is one set, and it is the way.
Post a Comment
Read more