Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label NWO

One-Way Door to Cooperation: Why NWO Must Be Hard to Leave

  Proposal Statement “AGI models developed using shared NWO datasets may only be deployed, exported, or licensed by active NWO member states. Withdrawal from the NWO results in the forfeiture of all access to such models and associated updates.” Why Leaving Must Be Hard In an era where AGI models are irreversible once trained, the stability of cooperation must be stronger than the temptation of nationalism. The Irreversibility of AGI Training AGI models are not just tools; they are ecosystems. Once trained on sensitive datasets, their outputs can’t be “untrained.” Leaving the NWO and still using such models is equivalent to data theft in slow motion. The Licensing Principle: Access Tied to Membership Access is not just a right — it's a responsibility. And responsibilities are sustained by trust, not by backdoors. A Structure for Long-Term Stability Feature Design 🔓 Joining Low-barrier: observers and Level 4 states can join with limited access ...

AGI Is Not a Bomb: Why the World Must Not Repeat the Manhattan Project

2 Last Inventions: Atomic Bomb and Artificial General Intelligence(AGI) Atomic Bomb marked the end of breaking. AGI represents the beginning of creating. Both of them can touch the limit of humanity. The Difference Between Atomic Bomb Development and AGI Development Atomic Bomb Development needed secrecy, but AGI development will need transparency. Atomic Bomb is technology of control, but AGI is cooperation technology. Atomic Bomb was led by governments, but AGI will be led by all of humanity. AGI Can NOT Be Made by One Country nor One Technology Company Due to AGI’s characteristics, a single country(or a single government) or a single technology company can Not make AGI. In this world, there are too many types of data, including languages, life values and so on. In addition, AGI’s safety requires input from multiple cultures. Further, AGI’s performance improves through multilateral cooperation including companies. NWO Is the “UN for AGI” The NWO aims to facilitate th...

Conditions for Establishing the NWO

  Difference Between Phonogram and Ideogram In the world, there are 3 types of languages, which use phonogram, ideogram and hybrid of phonogram and ideogram. Phonogram language: English Ideogram language: Chinese language Hybrid language: Japanese language  In my view, this difference affects how people think. Because native language affects to thoughts, then the thoughts affect to actions, finally the actions make the different cultures. Why the NWO is Needed To avoid a potential World War III and to build a cooperative foundation for AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), a new global framework — the NWO (New World Order) — is urgently needed. Current Situation Between US and China from Game-Theory Perspective Below payoff matrix shows the current situation. US and China have entered to non-cooperative equilibrium. Payoff Matrix China Gains China Loses US Gains 👍 NWO Possible ⚖️ Strategic Stalemate US Loses ⚖️ Strategic Stalemate ...

Purposes and Principles for NWO(New World Order)

  Purposes and Principles for NWO(New World Order) 🎯 Purposes of the NWO To serve as a reliable platform for the United States to step down from its role as a global hegemon with peace of mind . To function as a global framework for sharing data necessary for AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) development . 🌍 Founding Members of the NWO The proposed founding members of the NWO should include: The United States, G7 countries, and BRICS countries. This diverse composition will ensure that both advanced economies and emerging powers are represented from the beginning, forming a balanced and legitimate foundation for the new global order. 🗳 Principles of NWO Decision-Making Structure Member countries are classified into levels (Level 0 to n). The closer to Level 0, the more votes a country has (the number of votes is not necessarily proportional by level). All member countries must allocate their votes among three categories: approval, disapproval, and abstenti...

NWO: New World Order

  Decision System of the Hegemonic Union NWO ( Memo Extract / Conceptual Draft ) This is a conceptual draft of the decision-making system for the New World Order (NWO) — a proposed hegemonic union formed after the United States steps down from its role as the sole global hegemon. Voting Mechanism Each member state of the NWO holds three types of votes : ✅ Affirmative (Approval) ❌ Negative (Rejection) 🟡 Hold (Abstention) Each member is required to allocate at least one vote to each category — full allocation (e.g., all votes to one type) is prohibited ( "no all-in" rule ). This ensures responsible expression of nuanced positions . Voting Power by Membership Level Level Votes Qualification Criteria Level 0 11 United States only (symbolic hegemon) Level 1 9 Both economic and military superpowers Level 2 7 Either economic or military major powers Level 3 5 Standard economic or military nations Note: Leve...