“AND/OR strategy”
“A and B” means both of A and B.
“A or B” means only A or only B.
“A and/or B” means both of A and B, only A or only B.
If we use A “and” B, we choose both of A and B.
If we use A “or” B, we choose one of A and B.
If we use A “and/or” B, we choose “both of A and B” or “one of A and B”.
In the history, weak countries had to choose A “or” B.
Recently, weak countries can choose A “and/or” B, and I recommend this “AND/OR strategy”.
If weak countries choose USA side “or” China side, the world will be divided by 2 sides.
Choosing USA side “and/or” China side may irritate USA and China governments.
For this “and/or strategy”, weak countries have to recognize grouping power.
Grouping power means weak solidarity by religious, cultures, and languages.
Weak solidarity is not “alliance”.
Important thing is to keep own distance from USA side or China side.
I predict that if weak countries take this “and/or strategy”, weak countries can get big benefits, and these big benefits will improve weak countries’ economy.