Skip to main content

USA:From being Leader to Dealer

USA:From being Leader to Dealer American people have stopped to have leadership. I felt something sad, but it’s okay. USA country turned from leader to dealer. Some American wanted to make America great again.(MAGA) The world NEVER makes America great again.(NMAGA)

Evaluating methods: By straight ruler or protractor?

2016/7/17 Depending on Critical chain: Worst state in economy

Critical chain in economy is the smallest lack of margin. This economy seemed to have fastest growth. In fact, high revolution and performance economy.

The combination of this state & CEOs who is administrator type, makes economy worst state. Because these CEOs force to run company or economy by higher and more amount. These CEOs only can more & more speed and amount. They can't see the phenomenon from another views.

I think that there are two ways to evaluate people. One is straight ruler, and the another is protractor.
CEOs, Administrator type, has only straight ruler in their heads. So they depends on speed & amount.
On the other hand, a few CEOs have protractor, is strong to change, chance & crisis.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to find Cheat GPT in Business

  How to find Cheat GPT in Business Background ChatGPT is very good tool for Business writing. But ChatGPT is forbidden now when the Business treats secret information. I know it is right. Cheat GPT Cheat GPT is to use ChatGPT in the Business. How to find Cheat GPT? I found my leader’s Cheat GPT accidentally. The leader used ChatGPT in his home, so that there was no way to know Cheat GPT. I found it by miss font. The miss font was classic Chinese character(旧漢字). In Japan, no one use classic Chinese character from 1949. I use systematic grammar proofing application and it showed me there was classic Chinese Character. Abstracted way If there are many language characters, such as Chinese or Japanese, systematic font proofing application may be effective way to find Cheat GPT. ChatGPT and Hallucination is one set, and it is the way.

Own view to World and I

  Own view to World and I I thought about feeling method about world and I. The principle questions are “What is the World?”, “Who am I?”. There are several feelings about these questions’ answers. View to World and I I am [ positive ] I am [ normal ] I am [ negative ] World is [ positive ] Normal A Mismatch B1 Mismatch C World is [ normal ] Positive thinking Normal B Negative thinking World is [ negative ] Mismatch A Mismatch B2 Normal C I categorized the answers in above matrix. If “World is [negative]” and “I am [normal]” is the answer, Mismatch B2 is my position. Then if we want to change something, we should change view to the world or I.