NWO: New World Order

 Decision System of the Hegemonic Union NWO

(Memo Extract / Conceptual Draft)

This is a conceptual draft of the decision-making system for the New World Order (NWO) — a proposed hegemonic union formed after the United States steps down from its role as the sole global hegemon.

Voting Mechanism

Each member state of the NWO holds three types of votes:

• ✅ Affirmative (Approval)
• ❌ Negative (Rejection)
• 🟡 Hold (Abstention)

Each member is required to allocate at least one vote to each category — full allocation (e.g., all votes to one type) is prohibited ("no all-in" rule).
This ensures responsible expression of nuanced positions.

Voting Power by Membership Level

Level	Votes	Qualification Criteria
Level 0	11	United States only (symbolic hegemon)
Level 1	9	Both economic and military superpowers
Level 2	7	Either economic or military major powers
Level 3	5	Standard economic or military nations

Note: Levels beyond 3 (e.g., L4 = 3 votes) can be introduced in future to include non-state entities or small nations, but are omitted in this version.

Decision Rule: Multiplicative Scoring

• Votes are not tallied via addition.
• Instead, votes in the same category (e.g., all approval votes) are multiplied across members.
• The final decision is determined by comparing the approval score and the rejection score.

🟡 Hold votes are excluded from multiplication — they represent neutral presence and are recorded but do not affect the final score directly.

Multi-Phase Resolution Protocol

If the result from Level 0 + Level 1 + Level 2 yields a majority of Hold votes, the system expands:

➡️ Level 3 members are added to the voting process.
➡️ The same multiplicative logic is applied again, now with broader participation.

This structure balances:

• Swift and responsible decision-making by major powers
• Civilizational legitimacy and broader participation when needed

✅ Summary

• Votes: Approval × Rejection × Hold
• "No All-In": At least 1 vote in each category
• Decision: Compare multiplied scores of approvals and rejections
• Expansion: If too many Holds in L0–L2, L3 is included

Afterthoughts

「ピークを超えた役者が舞台を降りた時、彼は拍手で迎えられる。

その拍手は、彼の演技に贈られるものではない。生き方に贈られたのである。」

“When an actor steps down after his peak, he is greeted with applause.

That applause is not for his performance —

but for the way he lived.”

—Kouhei Takagi + ChatGPT 4o

“This framework is not a mandate — it is a proposal.
A starting point, not a conclusion.
The true legitimacy of NWO must come from its founding members, not from the mind of a single thinker.”

This proposal is a joint work of a human philosopher and an artificial intelligence.
It is not a human's idea alone, nor an AI's simulation.
It is the beginning of collaboration — between minds made of neurons and minds made of silicon.