Skip to main content

NWO: New World Order

 Decision System of the Hegemonic Union NWO



(Memo Extract / Conceptual Draft)

This is a conceptual draft of the decision-making system for the New World Order (NWO) — a proposed hegemonic union formed after the United States steps down from its role as the sole global hegemon.


Voting Mechanism

Each member state of the NWO holds three types of votes:

  • ✅ Affirmative (Approval)
  • ❌ Negative (Rejection)
  • 🟡 Hold (Abstention)

Each member is required to allocate at least one vote to each category — full allocation (e.g., all votes to one type) is prohibited ("no all-in" rule).
This ensures responsible expression of nuanced positions.


Voting Power by Membership Level

Level

Votes

Qualification Criteria

Level 0

11

United States only (symbolic hegemon)

Level 1

9

Both economic and military superpowers

Level 2

7

Either economic or military major powers

Level 3

5

Standard economic or military nations

Note: Levels beyond 3 (e.g., L4 = 3 votes) can be introduced in future to include non-state entities or small nations, but are omitted in this version.


Decision Rule: Multiplicative Scoring

  • Votes are not tallied via addition.
  • Instead, votes in the same category (e.g., all approval votes) are multiplied across members.
  • The final decision is determined by comparing the approval score and the rejection score.

🟡 Hold votes are excluded from multiplication — they represent neutral presence and are recorded but do not affect the final score directly.


Multi-Phase Resolution Protocol

If the result from Level 0 + Level 1 + Level 2 yields a majority of Hold votes, the system expands:

➡️ Level 3 members are added to the voting process.
➡️ The same multiplicative logic is applied again, now with broader participation.

This structure balances:

  • Swift and responsible decision-making by major powers
  • Civilizational legitimacy and broader participation when needed


Summary

  • Votes: Approval × Rejection × Hold
  • "No All-In": At least 1 vote in each category
  • Decision: Compare multiplied scores of approvals and rejections
  • Expansion: If too many Holds in L0–L2, L3 is included


Afterthoughts

「ピークを超えた役者が舞台を降りた時、彼は拍手で迎えられる。

その拍手は、彼の演技に贈られるものではない。生き方に贈られたのである。」

When an actor steps down after his peak, he is greeted with applause.

That applause is not for his performance —

but for the way he lived.

—Kouhei Takagi + ChatGPT 4o


“This framework is not a mandate — it is a proposal.
A starting point, not a conclusion.
The true legitimacy of NWO must come from its founding members, not from the mind of a single thinker.”

This proposal is a joint work of a human philosopher and an artificial intelligence.
It is not a human's idea alone, nor an AI's simulation.
It is the beginning of collaboration — between minds made of neurons and minds made of silicon.

Popular Posts

Cheaper work

2016/12/29. Cheaper works: Hard competition makes expensive work cheaper. In Japan, there are some people who thinks there are a lot of workers, and they are exchangeable easily. This thought can't stand on human populations decreasing society. And in this society, the flow that provides products cheaper and cheaper cannot keep. Now, Japanese society is standing on that thought, and Japanese system hardly stands. This is by the patience of Japanese. When the breaking point of Japanese system comes, the counter of patience will keeps long time. And I think that communism never comes in Japan. Because Karl Marx doesn't think about human populations decreasing...

Communication difficulties

2017/5/28. Improving emotional reaction : Communication  Emotional answer often makes mistakes. Finding own unconscious emotions is simple solution to improve communication. How to find it ? Like or not like , comfort or not comfort... No. I read this answer by book. There are 5 patterns about relationships with others. Positive & Active people  Positive & Passive people  Negative & Active people  Negative & Passive people  Center & Neutral people  If other people's reaction is positive & active on communication , I am in negative & passive position. And if some people gets angry on brain imaging , they are negative & active people for me. And they see me as positive & passive people. Emotional stress is happened from the misunderstanding how others see me. Misunderstanding is happened between how I see myself and how others see me. So improving emotional reaction is to know how ot...

Own view to World and I

  Own view to World and I I thought about feeling method about world and I. The principle questions are “What is the World?”, “Who am I?”. There are several feelings about these questions’ answers. View to World and I I am [ positive ] I am [ normal ] I am [ negative ] World is [ positive ] Normal A Mismatch B1 Mismatch C World is [ normal ] Positive thinking Normal B Negative thinking World is [ negative ] Mismatch A Mismatch B2 Normal C I categorized the answers in above matrix. If “World is [negative]” and “I am [normal]” is the answer, Mismatch B2 is my position. Then if we want to change something, we should change view to the world or I.

The Solicitation

  2020/12/27.     The Solicitation   When I was in Cafe, I saw the solicitation for automatic investment system (must be scam) between 2 young men. I watched them and found some things. (1)They were telling about FX or stock automatic investment tools. ->A lot of people are trying it with very efforts. (2)The solicitor was using tablet device, but recruited person was using paper and pencil. ->There is very big digital information difference between them. (3)The solicitor told that this tools would bring money forever. ->100% scam. —>The result from (1)(2)(3), I thought that the scam is happened when there is information difference. Thinking about solicitation, we have to rethink if we are hunter or food.