“AGI models developed using shared NWO datasets may only be deployed, exported, or licensed by active NWO member states.
Withdrawal from the NWO results in the forfeiture of all access to such models and associated updates.”
Why Leaving Must Be Hard
In an era where AGI models are irreversible once trained, the stability of cooperation must be stronger than the temptation of nationalism.
The Irreversibility of AGI Training
AGI models are not just tools; they are ecosystems.
Once trained on sensitive datasets, their outputs can’t be “untrained.”
Leaving the NWO and still using such models is equivalent to data theft in slow motion.
The Licensing Principle: Access Tied to Membership
Access is not just a right — it's a responsibility.
And responsibilities are sustained by trust, not by backdoors.
A Structure for Long-Term Stability
|
Feature |
Design |
|
🔓 Joining |
Low-barrier: observers and Level 4 states can join with limited access |
|
🔐 Staying |
Gradual increase in AGI access and influence |
|
🚫 Leaving |
Loss of all model usage rights; re-entry requires full re-approval |
Why This Works in the AGI Era
Unlike previous technologies, AGI does not belong to any one nation.
Its development reflects the collective intelligence — and collective risks — of humanity.
A one-way structure ensures that no actor benefits from others’ cooperation without contributing back.
Afterthought
“Marriage is a contract. I am still alone…
But even alone, I still believe in shared futures — and shared datasets.”
— Kouhei Takagi + ChatGPT 4o