Skip to main content

SIGMA: Designing Neutral Infrastructure for a Fragile World


Picture title:”PC is running!”

Each Concept in This Post

NWP (New World Police): A preemptive watchdog to monitor and prevent dangerous AGI development. A countermeasure for Nora (野良) AGI.

NWO (New World Order / Organization / Option): A future global framework for managing AGI, power, and peace. A top-down approach for a better world.

SIGMA: A decentralized and neutral online platform providing shared infrastructure, norms, and information across nations and organizations. A bottom-up approach for a better world.


Today’s World

Conflicts often arise between major technology companies (Big Tech) and national governments.
This friction is largely due to overlapping areas of influence and divergent priorities.
Big Tech tends to resist legal restrictions, while governments are wary of unregulated freedom.
These opposing vectors can be reconciled—not by control, but by coexistence through one shared platform: SIGMA.





What is SIGMA?

SIGMA is a decentralized and neutral online platform that provides “common infrastructure, norms, means, and datasets” for nations and organizations to pursue their own objectives.

It does not constrain member goals or actions.
It only defines the acceptable methods on the shared platform, which all members must follow.


SIGMA’s Two Core Rules:

Rule 1: Never attack SIGMA’s infrastructure or datasets. If such an attack occurs, all members are required to join in collective sanctions.
Rule 2: Always remember Rule 1.


Why These Rules Matter

SIGMA includes:

  • Infrastructure lenders (who offer hardware/networks),
  • Dataset providers (who contribute trusted data),
  • Dataset users (who apply the data for various purposes).

Since the platform’s neutrality and integrity are essential, any attack on SIGMA—whether digital, physical, or social—must be treated as an attack on all.
(E.g., stepping on your home LAN cable is not a violation—unless it connects SIGMA nodes!)


Roles of SIGMA Members

  • Infrastructure Lenders: Provide physical or cloud resources for the platform.
  • Dataset Providers: Share curated data for mutual benefit.
  • Dataset Users: Apply datasets for analysis, policy, research, etc.
    (Providers are often also Users.)


The Future of SIGMA

SIGMA does not enforce ideology.
It only requires cooperation in infrastructure and data integrity. This minimalist governance makes it scalable and robust.


Benefits:

  • Lenders: As membership increases, collective deterrence reduces attacks on infrastructure.
  • Providers: Access to an expanding network of trusted users and collaborative insight.
  • Users: Open access to curated, trusted, cross-border datasets for various projects—technical, policy, or societal.

As SIGMA grows, everyone benefits from shared architecture and clearer global coordination.


Why SIGMA is Needed

Originally, I hoped for a top-down sequence:
NWP NWO SIGMA.
But progress on NWP and NWO has been slow.

SIGMA offers a bottom-up alternative—slower, but more resilient.
A neutral government or NGO could seed it, and trusted infrastructure associations and Big Tech actors could help stabilize it.


SIGMA as a Balancer in the AGI Era

As AGI systems become more autonomous and capable, we risk growing asymmetries between AGI owners and non-owners—between developers and citizens, between data-rich nations and others.
SIGMA could act as a balancer by offering:

  • Shared, trusted datasets across nations and organizations
  • A common technical substrate for transparent AGI training and validation
  • Protection against monopolization of intelligence resources

Rather than trying to halt AGI’s development, SIGMA provides rails for collective safety and fair access.


SIGMA as a Global Digital Public Good

In the digital world, we already share air (protocols), roads (internet backbones), and signs (standards).
But we lack a global digital “public square” where nations and organizations can cooperate with reliability and shared ethics.

SIGMA could become that square.

By enforcing just two basic rules, it encourages openness while defending against chaos.
Over time, it might become a new kind of international commons
not enforced by treaties, but held together by mutual benefit, technical transparency, and collective trust.


Closing Thought

The world doesn’t need one master AGI, nor one dominant nation, nor one global company.
What we need is a shared operating layer where diverse actors can compete, collaborate, and coexist—without collapsing the system.

SIGMA is not the final answer.
But it might be a starting point for a better one.


Afterthoughts

"SIGMA doesn’t exist yet. But maybe it should. And maybe you're one of those who can start it."


Statement for World Readers

Some domestic forces continue to obstruct my peaceful intellectual and creative activities, despite my efforts to contribute to the betterment of our world.

As internal correction seems unlikely, I humbly ask for your quiet awareness and support in discouraging such interference—so that knowledge and dialogue may flow freely.

— A citizen devoted to truth, safety, and shared progress


Popular Posts

Cheaper work

2016/12/29. Cheaper works: Hard competition makes expensive work cheaper. In Japan, there are some people who thinks there are a lot of workers, and they are exchangeable easily. This thought can't stand on human populations decreasing society. And in this society, the flow that provides products cheaper and cheaper cannot keep. Now, Japanese society is standing on that thought, and Japanese system hardly stands. This is by the patience of Japanese. When the breaking point of Japanese system comes, the counter of patience will keeps long time. And I think that communism never comes in Japan. Because Karl Marx doesn't think about human populations decreasing...

Communication difficulties

2017/5/28. Improving emotional reaction : Communication  Emotional answer often makes mistakes. Finding own unconscious emotions is simple solution to improve communication. How to find it ? Like or not like , comfort or not comfort... No. I read this answer by book. There are 5 patterns about relationships with others. Positive & Active people  Positive & Passive people  Negative & Active people  Negative & Passive people  Center & Neutral people  If other people's reaction is positive & active on communication , I am in negative & passive position. And if some people gets angry on brain imaging , they are negative & active people for me. And they see me as positive & passive people. Emotional stress is happened from the misunderstanding how others see me. Misunderstanding is happened between how I see myself and how others see me. So improving emotional reaction is to know how ot...

Own view to World and I

  Own view to World and I I thought about feeling method about world and I. The principle questions are “What is the World?”, “Who am I?”. There are several feelings about these questions’ answers. View to World and I I am [ positive ] I am [ normal ] I am [ negative ] World is [ positive ] Normal A Mismatch B1 Mismatch C World is [ normal ] Positive thinking Normal B Negative thinking World is [ negative ] Mismatch A Mismatch B2 Normal C I categorized the answers in above matrix. If “World is [negative]” and “I am [normal]” is the answer, Mismatch B2 is my position. Then if we want to change something, we should change view to the world or I.

The Solicitation

  2020/12/27.     The Solicitation   When I was in Cafe, I saw the solicitation for automatic investment system (must be scam) between 2 young men. I watched them and found some things. (1)They were telling about FX or stock automatic investment tools. ->A lot of people are trying it with very efforts. (2)The solicitor was using tablet device, but recruited person was using paper and pencil. ->There is very big digital information difference between them. (3)The solicitor told that this tools would bring money forever. ->100% scam. —>The result from (1)(2)(3), I thought that the scam is happened when there is information difference. Thinking about solicitation, we have to rethink if we are hunter or food.

How to find Cheat GPT in Business

  How to find Cheat GPT in Business Background ChatGPT is very good tool for Business writing. But ChatGPT is forbidden now when the Business treats secret information. I know it is right. Cheat GPT Cheat GPT is to use ChatGPT in the Business. How to find Cheat GPT? I found my leader’s Cheat GPT accidentally. The leader used ChatGPT in his home, so that there was no way to know Cheat GPT. I found it by miss font. The miss font was classic Chinese character(旧漢字). In Japan, no one use classic Chinese character from 1949. I use systematic grammar proofing application and it showed me there was classic Chinese Character. Abstracted way If there are many language characters, such as Chinese or Japanese, systematic font proofing application may be effective way to find Cheat GPT. ChatGPT and Hallucination is one set, and it is the way.